BooksForKidsBlog

Friday, August 15, 2008

Hanging Tough: Warrior Girls: Protecting Our Daughters Against the Injury Epidemic in Women's Sports by Michael Sokolove

The triumph of China's gold medalist women's gymnastics team has sparked much discussion of the likelihood that two or three of the team's members are younger than the minimum age for Olympic competition, raising the question of the dangers of allowing such young athletes compete in the Olympics.

Michael Sokolove, author of the just published Warrior Girls: Protecting Our Daughters Against the Injury Epidemic in Women's Sports, has pointed out that, contrary to the popular wisdom that older, more competition-hardened gymnasts have an advantage, the younger, smaller, and allegedly under-aged Chinese girls actually have several factors on their side. These very small gymnasts, who look as if they should be practicing for their Brownie Fly-Up ceremony instead of world competition, as a team average 77 pounds. In Sokolove's view, women's gymnastics is one sport in which the strength-to-weight ratio is most advantageous for the small, pre-pubescent performer. Quickness and lightness enable winning routines, which accounts for the dearth of over-18 medalists worldwide. Gymnastics actually is a girls' sport, not a women's sport.

Youthfulness also has its psychological advantages. Younger, less sophisticated girls may be less affected by the stress of top-level competition, because they have had less exposure to media hype and the geo-political implications of the competition. And, as any parent of young teens can attest, the younger brain just has not developed to the point where consideration of long-term risks overrides current desires, resulting in a lessened fear of immediate or long-term injury.

Sokolove points to the eightfold ratio of sports injuries for females compared to males in all sports. He insists that this level of injury is not inevitable, but the result of aspects of competition which have evolved over the past few decades. He warns that both sexes are endangered by current practice which encourage year-round training and continuously playing of a single sport at a high level, without the developmental benefits of cross-training. Because of joint structure, however, girls are particularly likely to have ACL or ankle damage if these areas are overstressed in competition or intense training.

The author hastens to say that he is not questioning the courage or competitive spirit of female athletes. Pointedly he has said, "If you get a broken ankle in the NFL, they put a cast on it. In gymnastics they send you back out to keep on competing" (to stick a dismount in the cases of Olympians Kerrie Strug and Chellsea Memmel). From these examples, he adds, young girls learn they have to be strong and tough enough to compete despite serious injuries. That becomes the ethos, he says, where girls feel "we have to prove our place, our bona fides, on the athletic field."

The take-home message is that parents and coaches need to show sanity in the face of the drive to win at all costs. Equipment, training, scheduling, and intensity should be carefully supervised. Everyone involved with children's athletics must respect the needs of the growing body first. For both sexes, careers in sport are often short, but disabilities last a lifetime.

Labels:

5 Comments:

  • They ought to be in the shooting sports where the injury rate is zero. Every midschool ought to have an airgun program instead of feeding these kids into a program where they will suffer dangerous debilitating injuries or death.

    By Blogger Robert Langham, at 6:51 AM  

  • Shooting is a creditable SKILL, but not really a SPORT in the sense that it develops strength, endurance, balance, spacial perception, and coordination.

    We all need more active things to do with our bodies rather than with our minds. Think of the physiques of the athletes we've seen in the Olympic games. They are all different, but all represent what the human body evolved to look like before our lifestyles got so sedentary.

    Target shooting is a mostly mental activity which in school would soon be made into virtual shooting in the interests of space, safety, and cost--in other words a school-sponsored VIDEO GAME. In regard to physical health, more video gaming is "dangerous and debilitating" to the immature body.

    Like we need more of THAT!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:31 PM  

  • While there is a definite mental aspect to the shooting sports (as in all sports at a sufficiently high level), there is also a significant physical aspect to it as well. It takes great body control to 'freeze' the sights on the target, which doesn't happen without some physical training. At very high levels, the mere beating of the heart can move the sight-picture, so cardiovascular work is in order as well. We haven't even discussed breathing and the ability to go anaerobic during the trigger pull. Your body can only sustain a few seconds of time without fresh oxygen before the muscles freezing that sight picture begin to fluctuate, which is why serious competitors generally factor in some form of training for that.

    It's not as straightforward as you might think. Airguns are particularly prone to these issues because of the lag time between trigger pull and the pellet exiting the barrel. If you haven't tried to shoot them, then it could be fairly eye-opening to do so. The start up cost is low, and they are ridiculously safe as compared to trying a more 'physical' sport such as football or soccer. It won't take very long for you to understand just how difficult it can be to hit a small spot repeatably. And it won't take too long after that realization to understand the physical training needed to increase your scores.

    Oh, and don't get me started on the physical requirements to compete in archery. Now, that's a workout! :-)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:57 PM  

  • Dear Bobby Nation,

    Archery is a sport, if the bows used are not so high-tech that little strength is required.

    I have shot airguns (and other guns) and I know that the control of muscles, breathing, and (perhaps) heartbeat, and all of the necessary skills are difficult to master. (I shot the heck out of a lot of cans as a kid.)

    Still standing still and pulling a trigger is not going to build cardiovascular fitness very much. I think school physical education should include a lot of moving about to develop the heart and circulatory system for a long lifetime of fitness. If kids are not going to be running about freely outside (or doing heavy farmwork) as they once did, school P.E. needs to concentrate first on cardio fitness first, with skills at various sports second.

    Take kids shooting if you like. It'll be good for them in several ways, but it probably won't impact the state of their arteries when they're 64.

    Just a thought.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:55 AM  

  • An interesting article.

    By Blogger Cahya, at 10:19 AM  

Post a Comment



<< Home